WITHOUT fail EVERY book contained at least 75% of the recipes that had some kind of meat in them whether it was fish, chicken, beef, pork or some type of seafood. Only 25% of the recipes in any given book were veg only. So where does that leave your theory now? I'm gonna venture a guess that the cookboo
The baby had been born and they were still calling it a fetus. Typical NARAL and MSM hypocrisy. They cant even stand to admit that some people dont want to abort a BABY. Let's say that it's five years down the road, and some newspaper is doing a follow up article. In the article, the sentence "the baby was born to a comatose mother" appears. Wi
BUT, when those nihilistic aspects of it are used to discount the value of human life, and endanger it, then it is blind faith taken too far. I'm just curious as to how you believe evolution discounts the value of human life, or endangers it. I don't know if you were referring to evolution with this sen
I think that intelligent designs place is in a philosophy course, not a science one.
As sad as it is to see how some crucify him for everything he does, it is just as distressing to see how others find no wrong in anything he does.
To me, my spirit is that part of me that seeks God, that yearning for reunification, for wholeness, for completion. A definition of spirit I believe I overlooked. Thanks for pointing it out. <TD class=
By the way, are we agreeing on something? Great Ezekiel's Ghost!!! Maybe the Cubs will win the World Series after all...
I dunno, maybe it is a matter of how we view religious authority in our brains I think this is very true. Insightful, even. .
I wonder if we could really slide into someone else's shoes, how much real, tangible difference there is between a system of Karma and a personified God. Like I said before, in my opinion, the difference lies in that once you establish a personified God, you are establishing a being whose level cannot
There are still rules, something, even if it is a system instead of a mandate, and it still punishes us for our wrongs. I suppose most Buddhists would take issue with "punishment" and prefer it just to be thought of as consequences, but I have heard the same thing come from Christians, in that the rules, "the Word" as it were, is
I would kind of take issue with the idea that buddhism has no god, though. When I have talked with Buddhists, it is almost like they substitute 'God' with a universal spirit, an "everything". I mean, there has to be a guiding force, a system as it were. True, most don't personify it, but is there a fundamental difference? </T
Agree.
I typed a response to Baker's rambling indictment of me, but the page wouldn't load and I don't intend to retype all of it. Contrary to Baker's beliefs, my life does not revolve around him. Here's hoping he actually means it this time when he says he will never talk to me again. ***I know this is off topic, doc, feel free to delete it.
ON a blog, I told Philomedy (Philo for short, not Phil BTW) to shut up. And I am sorry. I tried to find the offending passage, and could not. I tried to remember where it was, and could not. All I have to offer in my defense was that I was wrong! And since I cannot find the thread, I want to offer a public appology. And a
On a different thread, the idea that a belief in God and spirituality are not the same came up, albeit briefly, and I was encouraged to elaborate on the point in a separate article. Here goes: I think the best way to present my point of view on the subject is to state, directly, the point from which I start: God and spirit are not the same thing. I think the
One is done on the most part for convenience (abortion) the other is not. I'd say meat eating is done entirely for convenience; and I don't agree that abortion is done mostly for convenience, but that's not a discussion for this thread.
If you abort a baby, fetus is acceptable. if a baby is born, why not call it a baby? Afraid to? Fetus was used in reference to the time 3 months ago when the baby needed more time to develop. The word fetus was used in reference to a time before the baby had been born.
One is done to live (meat eater) the other is not. Wrong as well. We don't have to eat meat to live. We eat meat because we like it. At least I do.
Abortion is MUrder. And I dont think thaT comparing it to Abortion is a valid analogy. Just to clarify, I was not attempting to compare killing a cow
I'll call whatever asinine I find to be asinine, and I'll thank you to stop this constant effort to police what I say. If you have a problem with my behavior, feel free to use your troll button, and tell an admin, a.k.a. someone with authority who I give a damn what they think. Anyway, since your pal Myrrander is among the disres
Hahahhahaha...this was so funny I had to read it several times and then tell my husband about it! Hahaha. Nice. Bwahahhahahaha...we do have some martial arts DVDs around...I'll ha
Split it anyway you want, but dont say she gave birth to a fetus. She gave birth to a baby and calling it a fetus is the PC way of saying "We wont piss off NARAL". Nowhere did it say anything about anyone giving birth to a fetus. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394
I don't even remember where it was anymore, drguy...dont worry about it...im sure it wasnt on any one of your posts, so don't go scouring your articles for it...like i said...water under the bridge...
They have every intention of mocking and insulting, as evidenced by the way they operate. YOU can't say "Meat is Murder" without villifying meat eaters. Kind of how you can't say "abortion is murder" without villifying every doctor, nurse, patient, town, contractor, carpenter, painter, electrician, boar
So you don't think that comparing food animals to holocaust victims and slaves makes a mockery of the holocaust, slavery, and every human being that suffered and died as a result? Good point.
JoeUser Forums