philomedy

Reply to You're a Racist in Current Events JoeUser Forums

But I gotta say, that's a pretty valid point, Philo. I know...the things I give up to make my points

Reply to You're a Racist in Current Events JoeUser Forums

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. You said everything I wanted to say, plus more! And for that, I love you!! You're welcome I'm glad you liked it And I love you too <img src

Reply to You're a Racist in Current Events JoeUser Forums

A very powerfull condemnation philo. Not real sure it's on the money though, but you feel what you feel and I defend your right to express it. I don't completely agree with you on

Reply to You're a Racist in Current Events JoeUser Forums

I assume this is the end of the days of condemning me for saying F*ck You A**H*le. Now maybe you understand the kind of frustration that led to my outburst. I bet you'd take your lumps for this one, too. Lol...I was waiting for you man...as soon as I posted this I was like damn...Baker has me...It was w

Reply to You're a Racist in Current Events JoeUser Forums

I don't really care how "hard" her life was/is/will be....she certainly doesn't seem any wiser for it. I don't really care for her pulling out the "hard life" excuse every time someone challenges her views on race...no matter what you say, she has to mention how she lives in the ghetto, so she's obvious

Reply to You're a Racist in Current Events JoeUser Forums

I can't IMAGINE who your talking about... My weakness is my vague nature... Bravo a

Reply to Blacks: Here's How to AVOID Being Stereotyped! in Current Events JoeUser Forums

When the black community accepts as its leaders such men as career extortionist Jesse Jackson and inflammatory racist Al Sharpton, they accept that these men speak for them. Why does everyone assume that Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton speak for black people? Because they're black? And why does everyone s

You're a Racist in Current Events JoeUser Forums

I don't know where to start. You're a racist. And a coward. And an attention-whore. You're that asshole little kid who hits people just so the teacher will turn around to look at her. I guess there is a level of comfort to be had from the fact that you admitted that your words were nothing more than ill-willed rhetoric spewed from a rambling madwoman. I can only hope you've fried your brain to such an extent that you can no longer put together rational thoughts. This isn't true, though. I

Reply to New Rape Prevention Device in Current Events JoeUser Forums

it also opens a woman up to being quite vile if she is pissed at her lover Yeah, but so do a lot of other things. That being said, hopefully she does not get drunk and de

New Rape Prevention Device in Current Events JoeUser Forums

Link Well, I've been gone for awhile, but here now I do make my glorious return. (cue fanfare and adoring throngs) It appears that South African inventors have come up with the "Rapex." No, it's not an aerosol spray that kills rapists on contac

Reply to On Spirituality in Philosophy JoeUser Forums

"Many truly spiritual people who are 'actively spending time' on it have an understanding that this, far from making us superior, is an indication that we have particular problems that require drastic 'medication' (- or meditation ) In fact the vast majority of my friends are completely unreligious, in much the same way as most of a diabetic's friends don't have to take insulin." That's another good way of thinking about it, although I kind of

On Spirituality in Philosophy JoeUser Forums

For those of you who read my "On God and Spirituality," you've been expecting this. For those of you who didn't, welcome and I hope you enjoy. I ended my previous dissertation on God and spirituality with a footnote declaring myself rather low on the spiritual scale. Usually, I think, that is looked at as a disturbing revelation, and indeed it has an unmista

Reply to Freedom of Speach! DENIED TO A US CITIZEN in Current Events JoeUser Forums

YOUR NOT GETTING THE POINTWhether he was right or wrong in his community doesn't matter that's for them to decide. Wait...so now you're saying that only Robertson's community can decide if what he did is right or wrong? Who's trying to control who can say what now?

Reply to Freedom of Speach! DENIED TO A US CITIZEN in Current Events JoeUser Forums

I'm pretty sure that when a citizen threatens to kill someone, he should be reprimanded...maybe that's just me...

Reply to Finally Weighing in on the ID Debate in Current Events JoeUser Forums

They just hate Vulcans. And Vulcans would be...

Reply to Finally Weighing in on the ID Debate in Current Events JoeUser Forums

Any questions? Yeah...what the hell's an Andorian? Cuz someone tried to explain it to me, but all I got was that they're some creepy mfers with nose-antennae who can't laugh at things and disguise murderous rage by calling it "diligence."

Reply to Finally Weighing in on the ID Debate in Current Events JoeUser Forums

When and "if" you can acknowledge mine.....I'll start looking for the ones you want. And like I said before, pay special attention to the one from "ucsd". You want a debate? Then do so. You made a statement and I said wrong and sent proof to back up my statement. What you got buster? And don't bother quoting some stupid disclaime

Reply to Finally Weighing in on the ID Debate in Current Events JoeUser Forums

So the question is back to you, why are we wasting our time seeking? I see your point. I was not thinking in terms of aliens.

Reply to Finally Weighing in on the ID Debate in Current Events JoeUser Forums

So I can therefore take it that you did not check the link I provided? And I can therefore take it that you can't provide the new links I asked for.

Reply to Finally Weighing in on the ID Debate in Current Events JoeUser Forums

and in another a higher intelligence decided to tweak it so that eventually we have man sitting at the top of the food chain. You can call it Genetics. It is a superset of it, The problem I have with ID (being called a science) is the higher intelligence part, which is the only part I see worth debati

Reply to Finally Weighing in on the ID Debate in Current Events JoeUser Forums

Nor does ID say who or what. SO you are in essence saying that ID is a viable alternative that does explain some of the holes in evolution? No, I'm saying that they deal with two different things. Evolution deals with how certain species survive and change over time. ID deals with creation. I'm saying

Reply to Finally Weighing in on the ID Debate in Current Events JoeUser Forums

By your say so it's not. And if that's all true then why is is it being called a theory by most sources on the web including scientific ones? By the very disclaimer's say so it's not. It describes theories as "well-tested." If you want to link me to the sites documenting the tests done on ID, you might

Reply to On God and Spirituality in Religion JoeUser Forums

My suspicion is that people choose their own spiritual beliefs because ultimately they don't really believe in them anyway. I'd disagree here. I think someone who searches for their own spiritual path believes in spirituality as much as, if not more than, people who take someone else's word for it. To m

Reply to The Tale of 2 headlines in Current Events JoeUser Forums

Ulterior motive? It was written before the NARAL ad appeared. They just stepped into it big time. I think we're talking about two different things. My entire point is that I don't think the headline you highlighted was done with any malicious intent. That's it.

Reply to Finally Weighing in on the ID Debate in Current Events JoeUser Forums

The Theory only deals with the fact that life is just a little TOO convient to be a random occurance. Ok, first, let's all agree that it's not a theory, cuz its not. Second, if it deals with the fact that life is too complex to have occurred randomly, then it deals with how life occurred, or who or what