the same paper did run another opinon saying, in part at least, the very opposite...... http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1255694838474&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
Basmas
In my experience when people talk about the land stolen is it the land post-isreal formation that is now controlled by isreal, not the land that was done when isreal was formed. But on a more philosophical point why just because a person of a particular race/reglion bought a peice of land shoudl that give them the right to set up a state on that land? Is there not a big difference between the legal ownership of a peice of land and the state that rules that said land?
School children should never be made to do this, it reeks of North Korea and 'the special leader'.
Ok. That is freaky and wrong, and I'm a UK left winger who was glad he won.
I am confused about the point - is it just that the Swedish newspaper did not cover is, or that it has not spread about teh Arab world? the story about Chinease organ harvesting has been reported in the UK for several year in the mainstream press
[quote quoting="post"] The New York Times, I heard, gave the number at 500. Yes; the Newspaper of Record called it at 5-0-0. No wonder nobody reads that fish-wrapper anymore. [/quote] I think you heard wrong http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/us/politics/13protestweb.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=tea%20party&st=cse puts it at tens of thousands
Kenya does have question marks over its treatment of criminals and other human rights issues. I have no sympathy for anti-semitism or inate distrust with Africans, nor did I compare Hamas to Kenya. I compared calling an anti-Keyans statement racist because it is African to an anti Hamas statment anti-Arab.
Can kenya be trusted? Would call it racist to say that Hamas can not be trusted with rockets (you never know with these arabs)
Is your issue just with the use of the word piracy? Because France and other western goverments are doing things to help the anti-somalian piracy
Oh sorry forgot to add something, Of course there are hospitals that are below the average of the NHS, there have to be!, and there have been cases where that cost lives. Has that never happened in the US? All parts of the NHS are montiored for the end results for the treaments they provide, eg number who get infections, number who die etc. The hospitials that have worse rates are spotted and investigated in a controlled and systemic fashi
The NHS does not decide who gets treatments, or anything else by looking just at the persons age. There are things that the NHS will not treat in elderly patiants, slow growing prostate cancer is one, but only for clinicial reason. The cancer one is simply that it normally takes years for the slow growing cancer to cause major problem and by that time they would have propably died anyway. They also do not treat because it is not worth it for the person, eg too invasiv
[quote] According to an article I read here, a man in England removed thirteen of his own teeth, because he couldn’t get in to see a dentist. Upon further investigation, I've come to understand that it’s apparently so difficult to do so, that “do-it-yourself” kits are actually sold to Brits in extreme need of <span id="lw_1252403461_4" class=
Attacks on the USA infrasturcture would have most affect for the lowest costs. In the UK a few years ago a group of striking truckers blockaded oil refinaries and it became public knowedge that the entire UK petrol sources relied on a very few refinaries (3??). Limiting their productivity could criple the UK, and the same could work in the US. I think that both contries only have stocks for 30ish days. The other way would be to blow up local substations.
[quote] The world wide web is going to be very instrumental in all this. [/quote] Then why do you use it? [quote] Wars, quakes, famines, diseases and disasters coming with more frequency [/quote] Did you hear of pencillin? Did you hear that for every decade in the 20th centerary life spans went up in pretty much all of the world? [quote] Did you hear the latest about the woman pastor who was killed recently in her c
I agree that if somebody crictises Isreaii, but not other contries that have the same policies that they are at best being 'selective' or anti-semteic. To be honest I had never heard of that wall before! is there not a difference though that the wall is buit on land that has been part of Spain for over 500 years and the people enlcosed wish to be part of Spain while the wall Isreal is building isn't in the pre-67 land and is enclosing people that do not wish to be part of Isreal
Sorry, I think you might be reading somewhat more into my comment than was meant. To me an 'israeli policy' is a policy that Isreal has. An Amercian policy is a policy that Amercia has A British Policy is a policy that Britian has. They all have comment policies in common and policies that differ. There really was nothing else meant by it.
[quote quoting="article"] The same police did not act against the progressive protesters shouting Nazi slogans, despite the fact that doing such is officially legal in Germany while displaying the Star-of-David flag isn't. (Ironically, displaying that flag was, for Jews, officially and specifically allowed even in Nazi-Germany. Jews were not allowed to display the German colours.) [/quote] Sorry to nitpick but did you mean illegal? I thought that most
You are right, this was a stupid thing to say without any evidence to back it up (nor do I think there will be evidence as I would be stunned if it were true). The Swedish goverment did say over cartoons that they can not infer in the press, they said the same thing here but the and the has been referred to the Justice minstery for a 'charge of racial agitation'
I'll get to the round-up thing later but no farmer in any part of the world has ever been forced to buy terminator seeds. Famers the world over have bought terminator seeds because they chose to. If the third world farmers want to have seeds that they can collect and use next year then they can buy them; monsato has not, nor can not, stop the supply of these seeds. Most farmers buy seeds every year as in the main they use cross-bred seeds to take advantage of
The stuff on roundup is well, not entirely correct. The active chemical, glycosphate, is entirely non-toxic to humans. It blocks an enzyme in the shihomate (spelling off, sorry) biochemical pathway which leads to a subset of amino acids. In human terms they are regared as 'essential amino acids' as it is essential that they are in our diet as we just do not have that biochemical pathway. The chemical blocks a pathway that we just do not have anyway, it simply ca
He did indentify himself and showed ID that proved he lived in the house. The matter didn't end there. He was arrested anyway. He has said that his neighbour did the right thing in phoning the police.
[quote who="KFC Kickin For Christ" comment="20"] Had he used the words "New World Order" do you think he would have been voted in? [/quote] There are some things that are just beyond satire.
[quote who="Leauki" reply="20" id="2305805"] You didn't quote the entire sentence, it was qualified: "It is anti-semitism to question the tactics of the IDF, who have a track record of harming far fewer civilians than any other victoruious army in the world." This was about questioning the (or those) tactics of the IDF that have already created a better track record than all other armies in situations anywhere near similar to those handled by the IDF. <br
[quote who="KFC Kickin For Christ" comment="4"] Obama is purposely taking us right into the one world order. [/quote] Sorry, what do exactly mean by the 'one world order'?
[quote] It is anti-semitism to question the tactics of the IDF [/quote] Why? How can somebody prove the IDF has done wrong if even questioning their tatics is anti-semtic? The British tactics in Iraq and Afgansatian are being questioned. So are the US ones. It is more a case of 'western' nations get questioned more than 'non-western' nations rather that Isreal gets questioned.