GalCiv2 ForumsAny news about the next beta version?
110 Replies
60,676 Views
e-stab
0
Posts
12
Replies
11,720
Reputation
I guess you're right, thanks. Whenever I'm editing a reply on the updated forums, I'm taken to the first page of the thread after posting the changes, is that intentional? Most forums have a "go to last posting" functionality, this one doesn't seem to have one or it doesn't work for me. I get to see the first page of a thread when clicking on a thread title or on the small arrow on the right, not sure if that is what should be happening. Usually the small arrow takes you to the
96 Replies
56,568 Views
Not sure since when, but we've been overtaken by the Kzinti Empire. :SURPRISED: With my last contribution being more than half a year old, I promise to give some points when TA is MV compatible.
1,775 Replies
2,408,131 Views
Is there going to be an update tomorrow?
110 Replies
60,676 Views
Congrats for the forum upgrade! It looks a lot more like state of the art than before. The text box is fine for me, using Firefox 2.0.0.12. Just a note: The link to the thread [link="https://forums.galciv2.com/?aid=300026"]"Forums are back up"[/link] from the [link="https://forums.galciv2.com/"]main forums page[/link] (under GalCiv II News/General) points to a "this post has been removed message".
96 Replies
56,568 Views
'Sins' in front of 'The Sims' - yay! :D ;)
9 Replies
8,066 Views
[quote]Does everyone there have something in the game named after them? The Wardell system, Carinoids, Lentzlandians, Kohd Kritter...[/quote] I guess so. :) IIRC there's something for Kryo as well.
7 Replies
5,565 Views
[quote]10 speed[/quote] Usually "+10(%)" speed ingame means +1 speed. It's a very old presentation issue, confusing at times.
87 Replies
136,703 Views
It is out now!
47 Replies
11,903 Views
Confirmed! There's a version 0.96a[b].004.
8 Replies
5,112 Views
[quote]I'm sorry to report that Beta 4C is going to be delayed until tomorrow.[/quote] Not a big deal - and thanks for the information! (Yep, I know that yesterday's tomorrow is today actually.)
47 Replies
11,903 Views
[quote]This week we're going to release Beta 4C of GalCiv II: Twilight of the Arnor. It's the first beta with some AI updates and will include one of the editors.[/quote] Good news! :CONGRAT: But - who needs Sins when you can have GC2:DA:TA? ;p
75 Replies
62,560 Views
[quote]+ FIXED: The Jagged Knife no longer automatically uses the The, so you won't see The The Jagged Knife anymore [/quote] What kind of tech is the 'The'? :LOL: ;)
45 Replies
77,253 Views
*double post*
29 Replies
72,498 Views
The 20,000 bc limit officially sucks? Yes it does. It should at least be scaled by the galaxy size or the number of habitable planets just like tech costs are.
29 Replies
72,498 Views
Hmm, I hope my points were noted by someone, somehow? *sends his nicest smile to the Elfish bug huntress* :)
12 Replies
6,837 Views
[quote]I think you're talking about influence starbases, while he was talking about resource starbases. I could be wrong.[/quote] My post above was about resource mining indeed. The Thalans can reach a maximum of +14% per resource starbase, while all (?) others have +39% if I recall correctly.
12 Replies
6,837 Views
Full blown-out custom tabs might be too much to ask for, but maybe there's room for a simple click feature? Just don't document it, and I won't tell anyone! ;p
3 Replies
2,921 Views
[quote]I would like the ability to right click an improvement and move it to another list. This would allow a great deal more customization for player style.[/quote] Seconded to 100%!
3 Replies
2,921 Views
Tech bugs and oddities as of beta 4a: Techs 'Fleet Defense', 'Xalax Defense Coordination' and 'Zalon Defense Mainframe' don't seem to do anything: No bonuses, no ship modules. The Terran ship modules 'Xalax Defense Coordination' and 'Zalon Defense Mainframe' are activated by tech 'Advanced Defensive Techniques', I guess they should be moved to their proper techs. An inconsistency: Terran ship module 'Stellar Avenger' (Attack +20%) only works in own sphe
12 Replies
6,837 Views
[quote]1. You could introduce an option - asteroid number=none 2. Option for Anomaly Number=none 3. Options for resources number - from abundant to none.[/quote] I agree. At least no. 1 and 2 should be straightforward to add, and it would be a nice touch to be able to play with fewer or no resources from time to time.
11 Replies
6,925 Views
[quote]WWW Link Hope link works check codecritter posts for workaround.[/quote] [quote]Update is up now.[/quote] Thanks to both of you! :)
17 Replies
5,089 Views
Could someone point me to that workaround, please? I'm not up to date in that matter.
17 Replies
5,089 Views
I think the underlying problem is that starbases still work in the same way than they did in GalCiv 1 v1.0: You build constructors and get modules. Now that ship building has evolved tremendously, they look a bit dull from time to time, especially the weapons and defense values of the starbases themselves. If there were more/better self-defense modules to make starbases sturdier, then there would be hope for them to keep up the race with ships. The way it is now, they're bound to lose and be too
139 Replies
36,141 Views
[quote]With all due respect, I think you are missing the point of starbases.[/quote] With all due respect as well, you might have missed the point of most people in this thread: The problem isn't that starbases are weak or worthless, the point is that you're better off building ships instead of using the weapon and defense modules, at least in the later stages of a game. That is a pity. Additionally I still think that some of the ship assist modules should give a percentage bonus in
139 Replies
36,141 Views