Meh. I'll use this threat to ask: Does anyone know if its possible to have more than 6 troops per battle in WoM 1.4? Logistics doesnt seem to do it.
w00t. The only way I can play on extreme, even with the new mod that I've installed that limits magic is with magic... :p Magic is awesome early on for scouting and killing of monsters with your heroes and then later it gives some good boosts. Usually I will beef up the armor of my main channeler, hit with him 3-4-5 times to take down the counterattacks of the enemy and then as a last hit deal somoe magic. There's some good troop boosts out there to. Also magi
Great maps people! Reminds me alot of the old Miracle Warriors map for Sega Master. Lovely game!
I'd love this to. There's tons of your classic 4x games out there with simple tactical/non-tactical battlles. Really hoping for something different. At least that it's being worked for and perhaps introduced in the 3'rd game. I'd rather not have tactical battle than have a card-system implemented. If we are talking about gameboards then War Hammer is my vision, certainly not MTG. Hoping that FE at least has the vision of
lol. Just cause of that there must be a huge orange rock for a quest or something :D
It's kinda a pitty that instead of working on some of the flawed but pretty darn awesome parts now that you have the base ready you guys seem to be withdrawing on all fronts to a classic 4x game. I think food should be a global resource. I like the idea of caravan food to and the possibility to supply-harass the enemy like some guerilla force.
Hey guys! I know the game is kinda flawed and full of problems and I know multiplayer is worse but before I stop playing I'd like to play one game online. Basically got the whole week free (well not quite the whole week but I can play at any time and do the other stuff later or earlier). Please write here or send me a PM if you want to play. The more the merrier :) We would be playing on fast mode I think
[quote who="just_jim" reply="105" id="3031195"]Quoting seanw3, reply 103I have been trying to get a copy of Phantasmagoria for awhile now. I don't think it will play on newer OS's though. I hear it is a great game. I looked this morning and found a website that sells older games... and they have Phantasmagoria for 10 bucks!!! The link is: http://www.gog.com/en/gamecard/phantasmagoria According to the website it an be playe
Damn good crowd here :) From Dust trailer seems epic... All I'm missing here is really Serious Sam and Fallout 1 and 2. Don''t see much mention of them Serious Sam for daring to be a pure arcade shooter with great graphics and a fun story from a small company in Croatia. It was like Duke Nukem Forever as it perhaps should have been if it was released back then. The tough-guy w
They feed on despair??? [e digicons]x_x[/e]
[quote who="kryo" reply="31" id="3030465"]Quoting scifi1950, reply 28A $60 game may have 30 hours of gameplay, but if you stop playing it after the first 5 hours then the dollar to hour ratio is 12:1, not good. On the other hand a $30 game with lots of gaming goodness that keeps you coming back for more (60 hours) has a great ratio of 1:2! Yes, most console games these days have "many hours" of gameplay. Unfortunately, 60%+ of that tends to be achievements and collectibles (I'm
[Quote]risk of a bad purchase because of your own lack of due diligence.[/Quote] Am I supposed to bitch and whine about him calling me lazy (in a veil of fancy words) or should I adress the point? That is the question. I'll pick the second and show that as a matter of fact I do have thicker skin than a newborn baby! :) Look. You all have valid points and I'm not really here to argue. But debating is fun and inte
Well the amount of modded maps that exist and everything from shitty FPS ro adventur games to their version of Dota to a version of Bejeweld extend its longevity quite alot. The biggest problems with the multiplayer is that it added very little new to Starcraft 2. Heck you might play SC 1 and enjoy it nearly as much. There are no unit formations, no turning of buildings etc. Its game mechanics are still stuck in the early 90's. But that's part of its charm to I guess. But
Frogboy you shouldn't be assuming things neither. I didn't say those reasons were corrupt. They are valid reasons. But I acknowledge you might have had others. The thing I saw as dishonest from you was not to release a demo. In a game like this it's so simple by just adding a turn limit or a faction limit or just including one tiny map or something. Good luck with Fallen Enchantress to. Taking things in smaller chunks is always
What tax? :S
Wow man I would be pissed if I bought a 130 dollar card to play a game I didn't like. I wouldn't laugh about it. But maybe you have so much more money than me so that you can. I did browse the forums but felt as if the patches were making progress and thought they would continue. I don't take "risks" when I purchase things, I assume certain standards. @Frogboy. I'm seeing this alot more and that's because
Shameless corporate promotion or shameless blog promotion? Commenting on his own blog with the same username he uses here as if he's an other user. Son, you're doing it wrong...
Depends on how you look at it... But alright, thought it was possible tomod a bit more. Thanks.
I was considering asking for a refund due to the total innability of playing it in Full Screen and its incompatibility with my graphics card but I won't since it wasn't expensive afterall and I've had a probably equal share of frustration as I've had fun. I'll just think twice about buying a game from you before testing it first, hopefully you won't intentionally withold a demo in the next game - it will probably hurt you more than anyone else this time sinc
Alrigiht. One thing I still think the UI is missing (if you haven't added it this time) is a clear population counter (Like 14/14) on the little city rectangle that appears on the map if you click one of the things in the upper right corner. But You've probably lost interest in the game after many years while I still desperately want to to enjoy it :P
Any idea why the UI was changed in the first place? Btw does this mod work with any other mods that you would recommend? And one more question if I may: Thanks for telling me how to create single units, helps a bit when you're playing on the two highest levels. Without it it almost feels impossible. Now I really need help with one more thing that I think should be possible. How Do I Speed Up Battles? Is there any code or any mod out there that spe
Like I said to you in the PM; still ain't fair nor good to release an expansion before the game is fully patched. We all agree that there's tons of potential in this game and I would understand if you needed funds as soon as possible to continue development but I've got info that claims that you've made turnover already before the pre-order finished. In this case you should first patch the game that you've released as finished when it's n
Overall a great mod IMO after testing it out except for two things. While balancing out some things to make the game a bit more equal and challenging like Tech Research and adding Magic Power is a good thing you do seem to be trying to reballance at least a few things that aren't imo supposed to be ballanced. Take the soldiers cloak for example. Imo it's not supposed to he an option just as viable as the others. It's supposed to
Well damn I guess I should never have bought this game in 2011. I'm screwed both ways now. Not getting FE for the waiting time while I am also not getting this game patched up in the forseable future. Feels so shitty.
Why the hell doesn't it have the tactical battle? To be honest it's completely unfair to the current AI but in multiplayer it would've been pretty good. I don't get it?