Infantes

I like the idea of mountains being somehow passable. Give them varying degrees of dangerousness and difficulty so that you can have impassable mountains where they are needed for a scenario, while allowing passage for other mountain ranges, only that you have to fear your army getting worn down (like gapper said). With special gear, abilities and/or spells you then could decrease the difficulty and the danger of passing through this terrain (as Tasunke said). I never liked that Civi

@ScienceMad: Totally agree! Well, at least in that these are on my list of the "most wanted sequels of all time". [quote=MagicwillNZ]failed to get the rights to Master of Magic[/quote] What? They really did try to get the rights? @Palinchron: And I would quadrupletrillionaise the amount... or something. ;-) No, seriously, also thought about that - the ability to zoom out of battle to have a look from above and to move your characters individually would have been awes

@Thiryn: Thanks, I´m gonna investigate that. =D @Wintersong, Saije and others: Sorry, but that´s not helping. As Wintersong has pointed out "it´s all behaviour rules". Of course you can find it dishonorable or whatsoever to copy games. Of course you can tell people who don´t have the money to spare, not to play a game at all, if they can´t afford it. But that won´t help. Not because people were disconnected to m

I just have to comment on this topic. Because I think that it´s not that easy. "If you can´t afford it, don´t buy it!", for example. It´s quite simple - if one can´t afford a game, the company producing it will not get money from this guy. So, the respective won´t-be-customer can get his hands on a "license-infringed" copy of the game without harming the company (at least, if he doesn´t use online-servers and by that causi

Yeah, could seriously be cool, mainly because it would allow for more independence in visualisation, available to a much broader range of people. And could be especially interesting for modders who want to put new and distinguished sovereigns and such into the game but don´t want to do a complete 3D-remodelling for each and every. With 2D-image-compatibilty you could pretty much just take the concept-sketch that you would need for the 3D-model and leave the rest of the modelli

Guess I can put my question in here since I haven´t found a thread covering this and it seems a bit awkward to me to start a new one just for my question. So, I thought about the same thing as the thread-starter here and came to wonder if it would be possible to integrate 2D-imagery into the info-cards? It would be great if a devoted player would have the possibility to draw a picture of his/her sovereign (or, for the modders, of new items, monsters, etc.), or to have sever

Hi there, everyone. So I got myself to sign in here so I can comment on some of this. First I gotta say that I´m no beta-tester, so I just have a pretty basic idea of what the game will actually be like. But that said, I like the idea of quests for the regent. I wouldn´t want the outcome to be too dependent on luck though. I know stuff like that from civ4 and it always makes me uncomfortable - mostly it´s either a awesome win or a devastating l