I like this idea better than my own. [e digicons]:|[/e] Anyways, they'd have to be a bit careful in some ares like dispelling spells, or any persistent powrful spells would be next to useless as everyone would simply band together and dispel them immediately. Other than that, looks great. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
Kitkun
Been reading about how it'd come around within one year for four years now. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote]True, true. It seems like everybody's canted to the right or left (but mostly right) these days.[/quote]Wut? During the US election, I couldn't turn on a tv or open a newspaper without hearing 'Obama is god!' [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote who="landisaurus" reply="5" id="2222084"]THATS WHAT SHE SAID![/quote]In your dreams. [e digicons];P[/e] [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
Camp 3. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote]Pfah. Of course he doesn't deserve it. He's Annatar! [/quote]I'm sure I could say the same for a couple of forum posters by the nicks of Luckmann and Landisaurus. [e digicons];P[/e] Also, you guys suck for not having any fox images. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
I vote underwater resources are kept in the game. Then spells are made to raise the land it is on. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
It'll probably be May 30th by the time the coupon arrives here. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote]But for every direct interventionism of the state in the economy, you will get another decrease. Always a small thing, but eventually, players who over-manage everything will have a crippled economy, as their merchants will wonder what's the point of doing business. This is a system that allows flexibility to micro-manage some elements, but discourage it, as you will weaken the more you do it. There would be an effective downside to overruling the economic system.[/quote]I c
[quote who="MetaNerd3ooo" reply="6" id="2216233"]*lost*[/quote]That probably says something good about you. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote who="Zubaz" reply="1" id="2215562"]I'm consantly amazed how much better PC componants are compared to PCs I have owned during my lifetime. You have to love Moore's law, right?[/quote]Half a decade ago, I was running on a 400 MHz processor without a GPU at all... However, I think I'll wait 'til nVidia unveils their next line. As I recall, the GeForce 200 series chips are gigantic because it uses the 65 nm construction. It's about time they move to the next smaller method.<
To throw a wrench in here: Do NOT, repeat NOT, let ZubaZ near your pants. It's why women have skirts and the Scottish have kilts. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote]Also, if you've ever worked retail or tech support, this is probably the best site ever: http://notalwaysright.com/[/quote]YES! [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
Because I can: My unprofessional opinion: OS/2 sucked. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote]Throw in their being 9 guns for every 10 people in America and im pretty sure we can kick the Chinese ass if they so much as even attempted to invade us. The only way they even have the chance of beating us is if its in a third party country (i.e. North Korea). If we fought them in China, they would lose because many of their people want democracy and would revolt in hopes of overthrowing the communist state. short of attacking our economy (which they would only do if they had a true c
[quote who="Seboss" reply="8" id="2210854"]Uhoh... preordered in November and Elemental does not show up in my registrations. Time to send an email to SD I guess.[/quote]Won't show up in Registrations until it's available to download. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote]As you can see "mine is bigger then yours" dosnt work here...[/quote]You challenged fact, you were corrected.[quote]your approval of the destruction and murder that took place in japan is also very... hell im speachless...[/quote]There's no 'right' choice for a situation like that. A few hundred thousand dead, or a few million? [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote]now unlike USA, when china will go to war, they will declare a spacial regime when the whole country swtiches everything for the war afforts which means all the factorys are changed to war production a communist country can do it within like a month, while in USA people will get fat of McDonnals while thair army is fighting and dieing for them.[/quote]You've read too much propaganda. The US would do essentially the same thing, just like in WWII. [quote]and t
They have to give SD the latest version in order for SD to add it to their servers. Anyways, I wouldn't be surprised if you could patch from there. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
I liked how in GalCiv units that went too far weren't immobilized, but instead forced to return (At a very reduced speed) to your range. Something similar might be nice here. Living off the land sounds good as well. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote]I've never played it, but I've heard of Custer's Revenge. When I read about it, I thought that it was disturbing and sick. If you don't know anything about it, then don't satisfy your curiosity. Maybe somethings are best left unsaid.[/quote]Search for EGM's 10 naughtiest video games. I still regret reading that. Link not posted due to NSFW. Oh yeah, although it's all about porn, it ain't all porn. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote]How would you see a limited communication system affecting a champion leading an attack orce or sent questing to a distant locale?[/quote]I can see this handled one of two ways: 1. Low-key magical link between Channeler and Champion? Where simple things like 'go here' are instant, but controlling in battle is hard, if not impossible. Battles are more or less auto-resolved, your messages moving to your own units/in your own territory getting a movement bonus, research/spells to
First off, the only 4X game I've had a chance to play is GalCiv, and I haven't been keeping up with these forums too much. I apologize if this has been discussed before. Anyways: What if anything more than basic communication wasn't instant? Instead of sending research across the map instantly you have to dispatch a runner. If you send an ally some swords, a new caravan is created just for that. Upgradable, of course. From, say, runner to horseback, horseback to horseback chain (Pony
Hmm...I like the ideas here. Although I'm not so sure about what exactly feared and loved should entail. For example someone who is feared will likely have plots against them. But if there is no plots, then someone looking for them through sheer paranoia will start finding lots of them. Secret police, citizens vanishing, etc. Some people just plain follow orders, no matter how deranged. Some people do things differently. But I don't think you really need to be feared o
[quote who="NTJedi" reply="9" id="2156706"] Not working for me... the link for woca works, but when replacing woca with ntjedi only an error appears. The error reports gremlins stealing my page?? Oh well.[/quote]If you created a blog, then you need to use the name you gave the blog. Don't know what happens if you haven't created one. Mine, for example, is not Kitkun. Me: Community Rank 127, Blog Rank 1,103