The Army You Have

A Philomedy Satire

January 22, 2005

Washington, D.C.

In light of recent, hastily made comments, Donald Rumsfeld has volunteered to open his world up for a day, hoping to dissuade the popular opinion that he is a crass and unfeeling old man, the likes of which chase little boys off their lawns for disturbing the garden trolls.

Mr. Rumsfeld awoke at 9 in the morning, about an hour later than he should have, and shuffled to the dining room in quite a disheveled state. Being late, he did not have time to eat anything but a bowl of Special K. He seemed disappointed that they were out of Total, which as we all know has a full day's supply of vitamins and minerals, but he took it in stride, saying "You go to the table with the cereal you have."

After breakfast, Mr. Rumsfeld rushed around trying to find a suit to wear, a search that turned up a back issue of Playboy, 2 Nike headbands, a Kiss album, "The Fast and the Furious" on DVD, and a copy of the Necronomacon, but alas, no Giorgio Armani. An agitated Rumsfeld called his wife, who informed him that the dry cleaning was to be picked up that afternoon at five. Rumsfeld, as he often does, made lemons out of lemonade, finding a blue polo shirt on the floor and throwing it on, along with a pair of khaki slacks.

"Sure, I'd like to have my suit, but what can you do?" Rumsfeld said. "You go to work with the clothing you have, not the clothing you'd like to have. Have you seen the new Sean John line, by the way? Or the latest from RocaWear? That's the clothing you'd like to have."

Rumsfeld's day at the office was a rather uneventful one, filled with stamping his name on condolence letters and going online to find a recipe for bouillabaise. At 5, he decided it was time to head home.

As he was strolling through the parking lot, Rumsfeld noticed a sheepish (or shall I say, chimpish) looking President Bush standing next to his car. There was a sizable dent on the door. The two talked in private, after which Rumsfeld came back smiling from ear to ear.

"He's a sweet kid, he really means well." he said. "Just sometimes, I don't know...Anyways, you go to work for the president you have, not the president you wish you had. I mean, sure we'd like someone who knows that the Warner Brothers' female bunny is just Bugs in drag, but what can you do?"












39,060 views 39 replies
Reply #1 Top
and I get jumped on? After the attack of pearl harbour if we had waited for "the army we wanted" the japaneese and germans would have overrun the world, unfortunately a country cannot wait for the military they want before going to war..I personally think we shoul;d have made martin and lewis, along with frances the talking mule do more fighting.

AS for MY president looking chimplike..... yer right a big fuzzy cute chimp... with a degree from harvard.
Reply #2 Top
and I get jumped on? After the attack of pearl harbour if we had waited for "the army we wanted" the japaneese and germans would have overrun the world, unfortunately a country cannot wait for the military they want before going to war..I personally think we should have made martin and lewis, along with frances the talking mule do more fighting.

AS for MY president looking chimplike..... yer right a big fuzzy cute chimp... with a degree from harvard.
Reply #3 Top
Very funny. I shared this with friends. And boy does this sum it up.......

We perservere with the president we have, not the president we want.
Reply #4 Top
Allow me to rephrase that...................

WE GO WITH THE PRESIDENT WE HAVE, NOT THE PRESIDENT WE NEED.
Reply #5 Top
After the attack of pearl harbour if we had waited for "the army we wanted" the japaneese and germans would have overrun the world, unfortunately a country cannot wait for the military they want before going to war


After Pearl Harbor, there was a coalitiion of dictatorial regimes hell bent on running the world. Prior to invading Iraq, there was a tyrant who should have been deposed, but perhaps maybe after the pressing issue of getting the terrorists was taken care of. And maybe Korea should have been fixed since they're the ones actually developing the nukes. Just a thought.

AS for MY president looking chimplike..... yer right a big fuzzy cute chimp... with a degree from harvard.


How possessive you get. You should try to remember that he's my president to, as well as the president of every person in this country that did not vote for him. Just because we didn't want him doesn't make him ours. I can go through scores of sweaters in my closet that I disliked, but they're still hanging there, and they're still mine.

And he does look like a chimp. Sorry. It's just how his face arranged itself. Kerry looked like a horse. Edwards looks like a choir boy. Cheney looks evil. These are all facts. Just accept it and move on.

And thanks for mentioning the bit about Harvard, because God knows that's all it takes for me to believe in someone's intelligence and respect them without question.

"Oh, he has a degree from Harvard...yeah, he must be a genius..."

Excuse me while I wipe off the sarcasm.
Reply #6 Top
WE GO WITH THE PRESIDENT WE HAVE, NOT THE PRESIDENT WE NEED.


Ain't it the truth...
Reply #7 Top
Harvard, Yale....etc. All those big name schools...if you have enough $$ to go there, its impossible to not get a degree. Money buys everything.
Reply #8 Top
All the partisan responses to one side or the other aside, this was just plain Hilarious!!!!
Reply #9 Top
Harvard, Yale....etc. All those big name schools...if you have enough $$ to go there, its impossible to not get a degree. Money buys everything.


Sad but true.

All the partisan responses to one side or the other aside, this was just plain Hilarious!!!!


Thank you. That's all I was going for.
Reply #10 Top
After Pearl Harbor, there was a coalitiion of dictatorial regimes hell bent on running the world. Prior to invading Iraq, there was a tyrant who should have been deposed, but perhaps maybe after the pressing issue of getting the terrorists was taken care of. And maybe Korea should have been fixed since they're the ones actually developing the nukes. Just a thought.


After? So you must be of the belief that only one operation can be undertaken at any given time, regardless of the size and scope of the operation?

As for Korea, the situation is entirely different. Pyongyang has the ability to turn Seoul into a wasteland in a few minutes through conventional means. The direct threat is to the South Koreans and Japanese. North Korea is vulnerable in other respects. They are economically vulnerable. If any aspect of North Korea is to be exploited, it would be in this area.
Reply #11 Top
Reply #5 By: Philomedy - 1/23/2005 2:41:54 PM
After the attack of pearl harbour if we had waited for "the army we wanted" the japaneese and germans would have overrun the world, unfortunately a country cannot wait for the military they want before going to war


After Pearl Harbor, there was a coalitiion of dictatorial regimes hell bent on running the world. Prior to invading Iraq, there was a tyrant who should have been deposed, but perhaps maybe after the pressing issue of getting the terrorists was taken care of. And maybe Korea should have been fixed since they're the ones actually developing the nukes. Just a thought.

AS for MY president looking chimplike..... yer right a big fuzzy cute chimp... with a degree from harvard.


How possessive you get. You should try to remember that he's my president to, as well as the president of every person in this country that did not vote for him. Just because we didn't want him doesn't make him ours. I can go through scores of sweaters in my closet that I disliked, but they're still hanging there, and they're still mine.

And he does look like a chimp. Sorry. It's just how his face arranged itself. Kerry looked like a horse. Edwards looks like a choir boy. Cheney looks evil. These are all facts. Just accept it and move on.

And thanks for mentioning the bit about Harvard, because God knows that's all it takes for me to believe in someone's intelligence and respect them without question.

"Oh, he has a degree from Harvard...yeah, he must be a genius..."

Excuse me while I wipe off the sarcasm.


Well!!! you sure told me!! gee I am crushed by your superior wit, your insisive words leave me breathless, I guess a poor uneducated lout like me has no chance of matching wits or words with you huh? PARDON ME, WHILE i WASH THE WHINE off of me along with the spit from your rant. Try to use a breath pad when you rant cause your stinking up the air of a free america.
Reply #12 Top
Reply #8 By: ParaTed2k - 1/23/2005 3:41:12 PM
All the partisan responses to one side or the other aside, this was just plain Hilarious!!!!


thanx ted I aim to please. eh eh eh eh eh
Reply #13 Top
After? So you must be of the belief that only one operation can be undertaken at any given time, regardless of the size and scope of the operation?


I am of the opinion that the direct threat to the United States should have been taken care of first.

As for Korea, the situation is entirely different.


The situation is a psychopath developing nuclear capacity. Yeah it is different, considering that North Korea actually has the things we were in Iraq looking for. I don't know how you define size and scope of an operation, but this is pretty damn big in my eyes.
Reply #14 Top
After Pearl Harbor,


reread history and try to use a dictionary..... that coalition was formed well before the attack on pearl...the war was already in full swing world wide, except for the unnited states... after dec.7th 1941 we got involved.
Reply #15 Top
Well!!! you sure told me!! gee I am crushed by your superior wit, your insisive words leave me breathless, I guess a poor uneducated lout like me has no chance of matching wits or words with you huh? PARDON ME, WHILE i WASH THE WHINE off of me along with the spit from your rant. Try to use a breath pad when you rant cause your stinking up the air of a free america.


You sure do read alot into things, don't you? Would you care to point out where I called my wit superior, or where I referred to you as uneducated? I would also suggest that you look up the definition of the word "whine."

You might also wish to note that typing is a completely non-verbal form of communication, and so one does not spit while doing it.

I don't know what a breath pad is.

And may I just say that you make free America's air as sweet as a Glade Plug-in.
Reply #16 Top
reread history and try to use a dictionary..... that coalition was formed well before the attack on pearl...the war was already in full swing world wide, except for the unnited states... after dec.7th 1941 we got involved


My reference to "after WWII" was simply in response to your justification for entering a war with the army you have.

Of course the coalition was in place beforehand. Of course we should have gotten involved beforehand. Of course if we, or Britain, or anyone had shown any backbone instead of giving Hitler more land in hopes that he would go away everything would have been alot better. (By the way, I know that we, as in the US, did not give them any land, so hopefully I can save myself a derogatory comment.)

Either way, show me the coalition hell bent on taking over the world that we rushed into war with this time, and your argument will have the inkling of validity it so desperately seeks.
Reply #17 Top
Either way, show me the coalition hell bent on taking over the world that we rushed into war with this time, and your argument will have the inkling of validity it so desperately seeks.


I have already said many times bush made a mistake rushing to war with Iraq... BUT none of you demoncraps seem to comprehend this.. somehow my admission of that is overlooked or because I refuse to bash and trash MY president, that is viewed as me "approving" or "blindly following" The point is The demoncraps are dividing the country,in time of war.. for me its as yogi said, deja vu all over again, lol. I went thru this divisive shit in vietnam and here you guys go again.
Reply #18 Top
Reply #15 By: Philomedy - 1/23/2005 5:13:43 PM


don't know what a breath pad is.


let me send you some then, and for the rest of your response its just as silly as you wiping the "sarcasim" off of you!
Reply #19 Top
I have already said many times bush made a mistake rushing to war with Iraq... BUT none of you demoncraps seem to comprehend this.. somehow my admission of that is overlooked or because I refuse to bash and trash MY president, that is viewed as me "approving" or "blindly following" The point is The demoncraps are dividing the country,in time of war.. for me its as yogi said, deja vu all over again, lol. I went thru this divisive shit in vietnam and here you guys go again.


I have said many times that I am not a democrat. I wanted Bush to beat Gore. I thought he would be the better man. I then watched him screw up royally.

I never said you were approving or blindly following anything. It's your prerogative to think that rushing into war was foolhardy but to stand behind the man that did it. It is also my prerogative to think rushing into war was foolhardy and to want the man that did it out.

As for your issue with the divisiveness that the Democrats are causing, it takes two sides to have a division. It is not the creation of purely one side. It is the result of two opinions that are different. So this division rests entirely on the shoulders of the Democrats and the Republicans both.
Reply #20 Top
I am of the opinion that the direct threat to the United States should have been taken care of first.


Would you also be in favor of the Chicago Police Department ignoring calls and investigations having to do with rapes, armed robberies, and burglaries because there are plenty of murders that haven't been solved and murderers who haven't been caught?

The situation is a psychopath developing nuclear capacity. Yeah it is different, considering that North Korea actually has the things we were in Iraq looking for. I don't know how you define size and scope of an operation, but this is pretty damn big in my eyes.


Now you're arguing over politics. North Korea has thousands of artillery pieces loaded and aimed at South Korea ready to fire at the first sign of hostile action. We could bomb the hell out of North Korea, but at the price of South Korea. They also have missiles that can easily reach Japan.

By size and scope, I simply refer to the allocation of finite resources for a particular objective: "What do we need to do, how do we need to do it, and what do we need in order to do it?"

My opinion is that your argument here is little more than self-righteous political posturing.
Reply #21 Top
One more thing, Philomedy...... If you want to delete my previous post, I'd understand. As I said, I sometimes just cannot help myself, and he's got me blacklisted, as have him blacklisted, so I took it here. I apologize.
Reply #22 Top
Would you also be in favor of the Chicago Police Department ignoring calls and investigations having to do with rapes, armed robberies, and burglaries because there are plenty of murders that haven't been solved and murderers who haven't been caught?


No, but I'd have a problem with them going after a guy who might possibly be considering leaning in the direction of undertaking a path which could end up with him committing a crime if they knew the guy who bombed the Sears Tower was still at large and plotting.

Now you're arguing over politics. North Korea has thousands of artillery pieces loaded and aimed at South Korea ready to fire at the first sign of hostile action. We could bomb the hell out of North Korea, but at the price of South Korea. They also have missiles that can easily reach Japan. By size and scope, I simply refer to the allocation of finite resources for a particular objective: "What do we need to do, how do we need to do it, and what do we need in order to do it?"


You're making my argument for me. You can't honestly believe, with your obvious knowledge of the threat North Korea poses, that our finite resources are being better spent on Iraq.

My opinion is that your argument here is little more than self-righteous political posturing.


Ditto.

Reply #23 Top
One more thing, Philomedy...... If you want to delete my previous post, I'd understand. As I said, I sometimes just cannot help myself, and he's got me blacklisted, as have him blacklisted, so I took it here. I apologize.


No worries. However, I deleted the post because it descended into completely unwarranted name-calling. You may attack someone's ideas all you want, but I think that name-calling leads to absolutely nothing. Thanks for understanding.
Reply #24 Top
Reply #21 By: dabe - 1/23/2005 6:45:39 PM
One more thing, Philomedy...... If you want to delete my previous post, I'd understand. As I said, I sometimes just cannot help myself, and he's got me blacklisted, as have him blacklisted, so I took it here. I apologize.


as usual you bend things to suit you, it was YOU that blacklisted me first,, then came into my posts and lambasted me..I did not even know how to blacklist someone and had to post a blog asking for help with it.
Reply #25 Top

Reply #19 By: Philomedy - 1/23/2005 5:57:39 PM


So this division rests entirely on the shoulders of the Democrats and the Republicans both.


finally something we can agree on!