

Though I would like to see some of the managment similar to NEO added to it...
http://www.caelo.com/ NEO: Nelson EMail Orginizer
I looked over at the Office web site, and I don't really see anything that would compel me to switch from XP to 2003.
What, as a user point of view, do you find better in Outlook 2003 in particular, and Office 2003 in general?
Outlook 2003 includes additional junk filtering, even above the thresholds we've configured via our mail server software. Honestly, if for no other reason than that, it's worth the price. Yes, you can store searches, it's got an improved UI over the XP version, and some other bits. But I'm happier with the junk filtering and the ability to add a toolbar item for "suppress this spammer" than anything else.
Now... the rest of Office... not to be a downer, but I don't use 95% of the features available in it anyhow. Office XP will do for that until I buy a new pc.
Should have added link for 'Backup' add-in http://office.microsoft.com/officeupdate/category.aspx?CategoryID=CD010798351033&CTT=4&Origin=CD010224941033
[Message Edited]
It's not difficult to change the registry to accomodate file attachments - my problem was that I thought the changes I made were not working when they really were - it was just some IE setting that prevented my internet explorer from opening properly when clicking on a link in a recieved email.
It's quick and painless. In my opinion, it is better than many of the com add-in's available that do the same thing.
[Message Edited]
Please Scooby, there is no comparison. It's like comparing Word and Notepad.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting and posting on the forums.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!