First full game

Played on normal. At first I thought I was going to be in real trouble. Tarth's ranking was at least 100 pts more than mine. I was also surrounded by their cities and troops. I had nowhere to expand to so I knew I had to go to war. I built up my army, got into position and waited for our non-aggression pact to end. (Really do need a counter or something that tells you how many years are left in a non-aggrestion pact).

Once the war begin, I rolled right over them. It was a little too easy. What I noticed is that Tarth had many many cities, too many in my opinion. I only had a two cities with a number of outposts. Tarth should have used more outposts and less cities.

Secondly, every city or at least many of them had barracks, command posts, etc. Tarth must have spent much of their resources on these rather than building an army.

During the war, Tarth had many more troops and they did attack in stacks but still too piecemeal. One small stack, followed up by another small stack. If I were Tarth I would have retreated to a choke point and defended. They kept attacking and throwing away troops. 

I simply took 2 strong stacks and walked through the world razing their cities.

Still I enjoyed and I am going to try challenging next.

2,153 views 3 replies
Reply #1 Top


Once the war begin, I rolled right over them. It was a little too easy. What I noticed is that Tarth had many many cities, too many in my opinion. I only had a two cities with a number of outposts. Tarth should have used more outposts and less cities.
End of quote

Having more cities is always better. The problem is that its not worth building half of the buildings (due to building maintenance).

Only one city should really have barracks and command post.

Therefore, the AI should be made less inclined to use buildings which cost maintenance.

The AI should be more inclined to field mixed army compositions

Soldier placement at the start of a battle needs to be worked on.

Reply #2 Top

Quoting Tasunke, reply 1
Having more cities is always better. The problem is that its not worth building half of the buildings (due to building maintenance).
End of Tasunke's quote

I would have liked more cities myself, but I was hemmed in.  Not sure about the mechanics. Doesn't too many cities slow growth, cost money etc. Isn't there a sweet spot between too many and too few cities?

I did take the first few Tarth cities to use for my own needs. But that ended up being a waste of time. My 1 major city was able to produce enough troops to win. Now if Tarth was able to fight back, they may(should) have over whelmed my big city with their multiple smaller ones. 

Reply #3 Top

You only need one city to produce troops. Also military buildings should also only go into that one city.

 

The rest of the cities don't want any buildings (other than those without a maintenance) and are just there to produce gold and science.