I'm not sure a different anything will help you remember the name; you'd probably just call them 'the tank race' or 'the spam race' or something more related to their attributes anyway.  I do like the idea though. (although giving any race an advantage with bows will make them my go-to since the current glass cannon status of soldiers would let them destroy armies from across the map with ease. heck it's pretty much my go-to now!)

On a more constructive note, could we also change what "recruit-able resources" do for specific races (or at least allegiances)? sort of like the idea of 'one man's pet is another man's main dish.'

To give an example:

in kingdoms the oasis could bring in food, where as in empires it could be prestige, but then the empires make the food up by eating horses. te kingdoms get their prestige through a different resource (like the scenic view).

For more complexity you could base it on race; while Kraxis IS an empire, they are still human, so maybe they get the prestige from the oasis, but not the food from the horses, etc. likewise, Paradin, being focused on magic and society, uses gold mines for decorating their cities, giving a prestige bonus, but losing the gildar bonus.

I believe this would help differentiate the various cultures of the races AND provide certain strategic advantages; it might mean that Mancer based races increase arcane knowledge, but the race of Men expands, while Kraxis, though small can churn out cavalry at an unmatched rate. Additionally, it would give players an incentive to go after resources for reasons other than 'i need that.' i.e.: as krax you have wargs and horses, you don't need more animals, BUT the trogs will get it, and that gives them food to get bigger so that your armies are a threat so, go grab it. Or as a Kingdom you already are dominating in diplomatic capital, but if the urxen get a hold of the scenic view their city will grow faster and allow them to annex one of your other resources.

So really that's all i've got. make the resources more variable, get creative, use wargs for circuses, eat horses, enjoy the view at the oasis and charge money for the scenic view. don't let those other races think they know how best to utilize their resources! it'll spice things up a bit.

I hope you're right, DSRaider. Faction differentiation is really needed badly in Elemental. Personally, while the stat differences are important, the biggest thing in my opinion is the lore. What is the difference between the Trogs and the Wraiths? They both are just grayish looking humans to me. The distinction, if there is one, is moot. What's the difference between Altar and Capitar? One likes red, and the other likes purple? There are some hints in their faction descriptions, but these distinctions really don't come to life. Of prime importance, I think that each faction needs a defined theme, and that theme ought to manifest itself throughout the game. As a guy who hasn't read the novel or gone in-depth into the campaign, I would offer the following suggestions:

Altar: Adventurous men of the land. Altar should have a hardy, "outdoorsy" feel. (Think: Log cabins, Horses, pastures, farms and windmills.)

Capitar: Paragons of the old order. Well armored, the most "civilized" in a city/industrial sense. Above all, Capitar should give off the sense of a powerful kingdom desperate to look unaffected by the events of the Cataclysm. (Think: Stone and marble structures, ornate swords and flags with crests upon them).

Gilden: Mountain warriors, rich with gold. Gilden's theme should be Iron, Gold, Mountains, and Tunnels. (Think:Iron axes and crossbows, buildings reinforced with sturdy pillars and entrances to basements and cellars, mountain-esque fortresses decorated with gold and jewels).

Tarth: Hunters of the wildlands. Tarth's theme should be "outdoorsy" as well, but in more of a forest/jungle/swamp sense than the hills and pastures of Altar. (Think: huts built around trees, walls of uncut boulders covered in moss, vine canopies decorating Tarth's buildings).

New Pariden: The magic adepts of the humans. New Pariden's theme should be magical elegance and knowledge (think: rune decorations, flowing robes, glowing magical crystals built into New Parident's structures)

Now, just looking at the humans, how do these themes translate into the game? Stat differences become quite clear. For example, off the top of my head, mounted Altar units gain extra dexterity, Capitar swordsmen gain extra armor when garrisoned in a city, Gilden axemen gain extra attack and defense when defending from rocky or elevated positions, Tarth archers gain extra movement through swamps and forests, and New Pariden swordsmen have improved resistance to magic attacks. These themes could also translate into global differences, with different buildings giving off extra resources based on the faction theme (IE, extra mana for New Pariden arcane labs, or extra production from Gilden's Mining Guild). The AI for each faction could also be tailor-made to these specific themes, enabling each faction to act in a unique kind of way.

Plus, I think that it would be a huge help if each faction had their own unique building designs. A Tarthian workshop should look quite different from a Capitar one, even if they perform a the same function. It would dramatically help with immersion.

Anyway, that's my main thrust. I agree with you all that there should be mechanical differences between the factions, but the #1 issue, in my opinion, is immersion and lore. If you work on that, so that the kingdoms and empire truly feel different, then you'll have achieved your goal.

As a post-script, these are my suggestions for the Fallen factions, as well as Fallen races (note: the correlation between factions and races is all me. I'm not sure of the actual race to faction ties, if there is one in particular):

Kraxis: Amoral and ruthlessly pragmatic humans. Their theme should be a distortion of the Kingdom styles (think: Jagged black walls, tamed scorpions, gleaming scimitars, a fallen, twisted Capitar/ Altar mix).

Resoln: The most magically attuned of the fallen. A nation of wraiths, sorcery should be their main theme (think: ominous fog, magical runes and orbs, a fallen New Pariden. Wraiths should look more ghostly to fit this theme, and to distinguish them from the other fallen).

Umber: The Umber are of Quendar stock, power-mongers who pride themselves in their Volcanic origins. Umber's theme is Volcanic, Mountain, Lava, and Fire (Think: open fires, seething steam, stone maces, rock towers and walls lined with lava pots).

Yithril: A nation of Urxen, burly creatures who thrive in the swamp lands. Yithril's theme is Swamp and Survivalist (think: Wooden walls protected by swamp trenches, strewn logs tossed about Yithril houses, game carcasses on makeshift racks, a fallen Tarth).

Magnar: A nation formed by the Trogs, ambitious creatures who wish to build mighty monuments to the heavens. Magnar's theme is majesty (Think: Ornate pillars, monuments, statues, verandas. Crowns, tiaras, and swords encased in silver and emerald. A fallen Capitar).

Absolutely, the Diplomacy screen would be a huge opportunity to enliven the factions of the world. Things as simple as the background, flavor text, and music could be redone to dramatically change the feel of the world. What about their cities? A Capitar city should look very different from a Tarth city, and a Kraxis different from an Umber. The same principle goes into unit design, though right now, a viable army requires a rather uniform design. And AI strategies! I want Tarthians sneaking around, prefering to destroy city improvements and goading me out of my cities, while Pariden bombards me with magic attacks and debuffs, and Capitar marches heavily armored troops straight into my cities to meet my armies head to head.

I don't think War of Magic has the time to worry about these things. They're too worried about fixing the game to deal with genuinely improving it. But I really hope that Fallen Enchantress gets this right. I hope the world - the races, the factions, the rulers - truly come alive in that game.