It was RavenX who brought up the bacon sandwich analogy, btw.
I don't get it...I really don't. No-one is saying they are entitled to a "better game" because they got the LE Edition instead of the Normal edition.
This is exactly what you're saying
As long as they live up to the original design intentions and DON'T make me pay another $70 bucks (LE edition here) for it I'll be happy. ...
also EXPECT not have to have to Pay For It out of My Pocket until the game is where it should be for what I consider my initial $70 was worth. Also, I'm pretty poor so I expect my initial $70 to be worth a lot.
Your argument is this:
1- I was promised XXX and I feel like I didn't get it
1 conclusion- Therefore, I should not have to pay anymore until I get what I was promised
2- I paid an initial $70
2conclusion - Therefore, according to 1-conclusion, I am entitled to a $70 game.
I am breaking down your argument 2 (I'm fine with your first one).
2- I paid an initial $70. $20 of this is for goodies. $50 was for the base game itself.
2a- I am happy with my $20 goodies
2conclusion- Therefeore, according to 1-conclusion, I am entitled to a $50 game.
The reason is because, for me
2- I paid an initial $50
2conclusion - Therefore, according to 1-conclusion, I am entitled to a $50 game.
Believing since you spent $70 on the game (and you're poor so it's worth "more" to you than to me), you deserve a $70 game instead of a $50 game.
OK people you know damn well what Raven means and don't pretend you don't. This nick picking crap is stupid. It does not matter what you spent on a game if it does not live up to what it is suppose to be then you did not get your money's worth no matter how much you paid for it. It hurts more when you spent $70 as opposed to $30 but it is still a loss. So yes if I spent $70 on the package deal and the game is crap then I will have waisted $70 not $50 despite what else came with the game (I only use this last part as an example, I don't think the game is crap yet)