KFC Kickin For Christ KFC Kickin For Christ

Another Historical Day for Obama!

▼

Another Historical Day for Obama!

Just chalk it right up with the others

from JoeUser Forums

So Obama's made history yet again. 

He wasn't just content in being the first black President. 

He wasn't content in being the first President ever in helping the government obtain dominate shareholder status in the auto industry. 

He wasn't even content on having the unemployment rate jump higher than ever.

He now can boast  of yet another historical first. 

He now can say he's the only President EVER who has run the deficit all the way to the ONE TRILLION dollar mark! 

And by the way things are going, he's going to make sure nobody can break his record.  The word out there is that there's a possibility we may see a TWO TRILLION deficit by the fall. 

So nobody out there can really say Obama isn't  truly successful.  He's very successful at making history and ummm...some might say bad decisions. 

Who else can boast of such things as grand as this? 

And......he's not done yet!   But look at the bright side!  He can sure talk the legs off a mule can't he?  :)

Oh Lord, we have three more years to go! 

 

democrat
35,995 views 33 replies
Reply #26 from Stardock Forums Top

I like the example Beck used the other day when he asked when public anything is ever better than private anything?

If you were looking to use a bathroom and had a choice between using a public bathroom or a private which would you choose?

How about a public vs a private school?  Which would you choose if you had the choice to make? 

The Prime Minister of Italy, instead of using the free medical system they had over there, came here to have his heart surgery.  Why?  Again, private is better than public.  That's why.  He could make the choice.  If we go public with our health care, where do we get to go? 

Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top

I find it interesting that Congress doesn't want this government health care for themselves. If it's good enough for the people why isn't it good enough for them? Perhaps they know it's crap? They are trying to ram it through fast for one reason. It's like a dead fish, the longer it remains out in the sun the worse it stinks.

The truth is that thie current Congress and Administration are spending money ar a record pace. In the short time this Administration has been in power they have already budgeted to spend more money than all previous administrations combined. In a time of economic crisis spending like a drunken sailor is insane. You simply can't spend your way out of an economic crisis. I wouldn't even mind so much if they were spending money on things that would actually benefit the economy in some way, but millions of dollars to study sheep farts, and various other far left pet projects is just stupid. Only a very small portion of the so-called stimulus bill is for our infrastructure or anything else that would make sense. The lion's share is for stupid pet projects that are a total waste of money in our current situation.

No, the current crisis is not the sole fault of the current Congress or Aministration. It is the result of many, many bad decisions over several decades, made by both sides of the aisle. But this current bunch is doing the exact opposite of what should be done to resolve the problem. The decisions they are making will drive the final nail into the coffin of this economy if something isn't done to divert it. They seem bent on driving as much business out of this country as possible and crippling whatever is left.

Personally, I'd love to see the people vote out every single person up for re-election next year regardless of their party. Toss them all out on their ears.

SoundPackager - Customize the Windows sound scheme
Reply #28 from Stardock Forums Top

Quoting KFC, reply 20


  Had he used the words "New World Order" do you think he would have been voted in? 
 

End of KFC's quote

There are some things that are just beyond satire.

Reply #29 from Stardock Forums Top

I agree with what Mason said.  We act surprised by the fact that politicians are spending out of control.  The politicians are suppose to represent the population (yeah I know they're not) yet they are acting like the U.S as a whole.  The 'I want it NOW!' attitude.  I  know people who are filing for Chapter 13 bankrupcy.  Essentially, all your debt is null with Chapter 13.  Yeah this kills your credit, but someone has to pay for the debt. I'm not totally against helping people for I know people who had unexpected expenses that just happened/came up and it wasn't like they were trying to go into debt. 

On the subject of congress, why do they get free health care for life (yes I realized its after them getting elected for a second time)? why do they get to vote for their own pay raises? Why does a congressional person need to get an average salary of $175,000 dollars AND when they work about 5-6 months a year (does nothing else needed to get done those other let's just say 3 months? I'm not saying they shouldn't get time off) ? Does ANYONE think any of that is fair?

I can understand the reason behind why a Supreme Court Justice being on board for life.  The Chief Justice gets paid 217,000 a year and associate justices get paid 208,000 a year (oh yeah a little hidden tidbit you won't ever hear is that they also get free housing as well).  The Supreme Court Justices only hears cases 4 days a week.  They have at least 4 months off for summer recess. AND get health care for life.

Yep, I like helping people.........

Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top

Much of what you say I agree with Utemia. But the fact of the matter is the Dems were/are responsible for most of this mess.
End of quote

What about the republicans who let Bush run amock with spending? They must be Dems in disguise, right? >_>

Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top

Personally, I'd love to see the people vote out every single person up for re-election next year regardless of their party. Toss them all out on their ears.
End of quote

Amen!  Let's spread the word! 

 

Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top

What about the republicans who let Bush run amock with spending? They must be Dems in disguise, right?
End of quote

Bush's looking more & more like a frickin' tightwad with each passing day.  And there are too many RINO's to count.  If I could, I'd arrange for every incumbent to lose in the next two elections (in 2012, I'd throw out whoever got elected in 2010).  I don't know how else to deliver the message.  I feel like Peter Finch.

Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top

Bush's looking more & more like a frickin' tightwad with each passing day. And there are too many RINO's to count. If I could, I'd arrange for every incumbent to lose in the next two elections (in 2012, I'd throw out whoever got elected in 2010). I don't know how else to deliver the message. I feel like Peter Finch.
End of quote

 

I could go with that; I have always strongly believed that we need to oust every single incumbent, democrat or republican. It's like the saying, "Politicians need to be changed regularly like diapers, and for the same reason."