Official because you both have been making it to be. First of all there should not be this horse excluding thing, is it because Luckmann-want-it-all dislikes it?. There are horses, unicorns, then bears, panda or so, boars, bipede bird, giant cats(felines), the creature shouldn't really matter, but a big participation do.
"Luckmann[bears] mittens, can't you go on the forums and tell FlyGuy7 to stuff it?
17:29 mittens I'm not much of a forum presence.
17:30 Annatar (It's because of his spelling, or lack thereof)
17:30 Luckmann[bears] Doesn't matter. But we know that you won't get banned for just telling him to shut up."
Should you learn to do it. But I'm probably just going to watch how this game developes.
And the Tiger pics are very nice.
Now you're really going overboard. That is completely out of context. Granted, I was getting tired of your stuffed-up attitude about the whole thing, but it was still done as a joke.
I didn't want to dignify this thread with a serious response, but if this is to be considered one, even in my inebriated state as it were, then by all means. Because this is getting ridiculous. What is wrong with you?
I don't mind serious critique against multiple kinds of mounts, but this is ridiculous. This is just hitting the entire subject from an angle that is beyond belief.
Seriously this time, grow a funny bone already. And not a funny-bone. Just any bone. As long as it's funny.
"You either didn't read that whole thread, didn't understand it, or are intentionally quoting him out of context."
I'll remove that then. No it's not language barrier that was just something that I had quoted. There he called Horses stupid, ordinary mounts and promoted Bears. Well, that some people like horses should come to mind. If a Horse is stupid, a Bear is no more IMO. The whole Bear was arbitrary and you guys are trying to elevate that has an official thing. Not even many players were consulted or a poll was made. It was just a small club promoting it. Thats not fun at all. Not everyone just wish Bears, also they should not talk for everybody else. This things should be together or voted on, other people should have the chance to voice too. This should be a united group.
But like I said, I personaly don't have dissafection for anyone, just for the way that went and felt arbitrary over what is a big group.
God, you know what I hate about this? Picking apart my own arbitrarily and tounge-in-cheek made posts, just to explain it to someone that doesn't have a clue.
The fact that I need to somehow validate a jokingly-made-but-serious spur-of-the-moment thread to someone that doesn't grasp the concept at all. While DRUNK, at that! The humility!
If I were a mod, I'd have you banned just for an abundance of dumb. Try to understand this - I don't mind horse mounts at all. What I want, and have always wanted, are a variety of normal mounts. My personal disdain for horses is of no consequence.
Why would I care? I know Vandenburg does (Pegasi), and I've always supported Vandenburg (and Pegasi).
No I'm not! That's a flat-out lie!
Oh, I'm sorry. Should I consult the forum before I make a post? Should I somehow create a poll and wait a month before I make a suggestion touching on the relevant subject? Am I, or the rest of the Bear Cavalry Crusaders, somehow not entitled to our own opinion? I am sorry, I didn't realize that as soon as something becomes a forum-wide meme, it becomes public domain, l as if the 'public' is somehow some kind of mutual ownership of product X.
This is not a democracy. There shouldn't be a vote. It's a movement of the individual, where Stardock ultimately decides what goes into the game or not. If a number of individuals choose to support a certain idea, wheter it's just bear cavalry or as me, a multitude of 'average' mounts, doesn't have anything to do with the majority.
And in this, I don't care if I'm banned, or get a warning, because I feel that it needs to be said;
You're a pretentious idiot. Get a grip, for the love of god.