Who Needs Debates?....Let'em Fight it Out!

PRESIDENTIAL COMBAT!!!

To further express my annoyance with this stupid election and all the crap that comes with it I propose a new method of proving who's views are more correct. It's simple place the president/candidate and vice president/candidate in a steel, electrified cage and give them small melee weapons and let them have at if for the two hours when they would normally blab about the same crap as they have for the past 6 months. This would definately increase viewing and would go great with those ass-sucking reality TV junkies. Really, who wouldn't want to watch team Republican go against team Democrat and maybe even a threeway with the Independents? A marvelous non-lethal but bloody debate with knives, sticks, daggers....whatever... This process will definately produce a clear winner in the eyes of the people as well as provide some income for them with the inevitable bets that will spring up. Which also raises the question, "Which candidates(Democrat, Republican, or Independent) do you think will win in a brawl where the only way to lose is to become unconscious or give up?"

Well, that's it for me....hope you enjoyed the mayhem in my mind!,
~Zoo
5,977 views 4 replies
Reply #1 Top
Hmmm...offhand, I started to say Bush would win...but then I remembered that Kerry's killed people before. But then again, Kerry wouldn't have a gun, so Bush might be able to take him. Maybe it should be a drinking contest...nah, Bush would win that one too...My vote goes for Ralph Nader because he's a wiry motherfucker...
Reply #2 Top
Coming soon to Pay-per-view ELECTION SLAM DOWN 2004. Wrestling for the Democrats: John "Swift Boat" Kerry, John "Nascar" Edwards and James "I married a Republican" Carvelle. For the Republicans George "Whooping 'em for God" Bush, Dick "Democrats love Bin Laden" Cheney and Karl "We can't lose with Spin" Rove. 6 men, one title! 6 men, the ultimate prize.

And you vote for the winners!!!!

Woohoo!
Reply #3 Top
Good card, CrispE, I'd watch.

Vice presidentially, I'd take Edwards, I can't imagine Cheney has any speed left at all, he'd get too pissed off to be worth anything in the ring anyway.

As for the front runners, I couldn't say. Bush is probably more of a scrapper but Kerry has better leverage with his size. Kerry would probably look more like the bumbling idiot trying to catch Bush running around him not doing anything.

And so, with that said, I have to fall back on politics, I take Kerry in a bloody mess. But if Nader was included, I'd take him. Like myrrander said, he's a wiry motherfucker...whatever that means lol.
Reply #4 Top
Nice one CrispE!



Good article Shaun!

~carebear~