ID's Year with Vista

Has it been that long already?

It's kind of hard to believe that one year has gone by since the release of Windows Vista.  It seems like all the hype was just yesterday, but even thought the release is far behind us, that certainly hasn't stopped people from talking about it.  Being that Vista is one year old, I wanted to give my take on how my Vista experience has been throughout the past year.

Vista and I had a rough start to be honest.  I was first using Vista as a dual-boot with XP, mainly because my printer would not work with Vista and a few other minor compatibility issues.  After a couple of months I was pleased that Dell updated my printer drivers to work with Vista.  Unfortunately at that time, my PC decided it didn't like me anymore and the motherboard went its separate way, so I had to build a new PC from scratch.  That seemed like a good time to install Vista Ultimate and start fresh again.

I really didn't like working with Vista much at first.  Looking back now I think it was more of a dislike of not working with XP.  However, I quickly picked up on the changes in Vista and eventually began to enjoy working with it.  As far as hardware goes, I built a pretty nice Core 2 Duo system with an Nvidia 7600GT video card and 2gb of RAM.  It runs beautifully and the only issues I had was the lack of an audio driver from Turtle Beach, which has since been taken care of.

One of the biggest complaints you hear about Windows Vista, is its problem with application compatibility.  The only big issue I had with this was with Photoshop CS2.  Strange enough, the problem has since worked itself out, although I have no reason why, but hey it works. 

Performance wise Vista has lived up to my expectations.  I experienced a noticeable difference  in performance between XP and Vista on the machines, but whatever you do, do not run Vista with less than 2GB of RAM.  Memory is just too cheap these days, so save yourself the trouble and get more.  The only issue I have with performance now is the awful boot time.  It just seems like it takes forever to get to a workable desktop.

Is Vista perfect?  Absolutely not, but after working with it for over a year I would now rather have Vista on my PC than XP.  I was going to list the things I don't like, but I figured we hear enough of that every other day.  The common problems with Vista are known, and hopefully many will be addressed in the upcoming SP1. 

So overall, after a year of usage I give Vista a 7 on the scale of how much I like it.  I have a huge list of things I want to see for the next version of Windows, but we will save that for another day.

 

6,619 views 21 replies
Reply #1 Top

Performance wise Vista has lived up to my expectations.
End of quote

I'll second that. I've got Vista and XP installed on the same machine, and Vista is way faster than XP.

Reply #2 Top
Still using both XP and Vista. I agree that Vista is faster than XP.
Reply #3 Top
i'm using them in separated PC and i had to agree vista is faster.


Reply #4 Top
I'm preparing to switch to a new PC and Vista. Nice article.
Reply #5 Top
I'm preparing to switch to a new PC and Vista
End of quote


 :SURPRISED: 
Reply #6 Top
Tried it with a power set up and found it slower than XP. Liked some of the things I saw but will wait till later in year till SP2 comes out......and then try again.
Reply #7 Top
I agree Vista has lived up to my expectations performance wise,Much faster than XP.
Reply #8 Top
my printer would not work with Vista
End of quote


My printer wouldn't work on Vista either. So I went to "Add a Printer" and pointed to the XP printer driver and now it works fine.
Reply #9 Top
And if anyone is in the market for a 'lite' version of Vista this maybe worth checking out WWW Link
Reply #10 Top

I've had no compatibility issues, or hardware issues with Vista - except for one, the now well known issue with Outlook 2002 not being able to save passwords. I now have Outlook 2007.

You'd think Microsoft's own software would be compatible. Apparently not...  ;) 

Reply #11 Top
Fuzzy - have you tried Window Live Mail?

I'm liking it...
Reply #12 Top

I've tried all sorts of e-mail programs, but none have all the features of Outlook. There are just too many things I'm used to, missing.

Reply #13 Top
CS2 works for me too, but Aero drops out of it and it runs basic.
Reply #14 Top
Hm.... idk, I think that Vista is WAYYYYY slower than XP is, I don't plan on upgrading any time soon, or at least until they have SP1 or 2 out. XP Sp3 is probably going to fix any little minor bugs. I just don't like Vista for some reason. I like macs the best. they don't freeze every couple of days.
Reply #15 Top
whats really weird is my dad has an old version of MS Office (I'm talking 97) and it works OK with vista, and yet outlook 2002 wont work. weird
Reply #16 Top

The only hardware "problem" I encountered after installed Vista, was that lack of drivers for my Brother printer.
The printer wasn't listed at their site as Vista compatible... "Bugger, new printer :|" I thought
Yet.... Vista picked it up straight away! Even has it listed as the correct model and all.
Funny how the manufacturer claims it's not compatible, yet Vista claims otherwise ;)

I like macs the best. they don't freeze every couple of days.
End of quote

Pardon my french, but your PC('s) must have been utter crap then.....
I haven't had a PC freeze up on me for years!

Reply #17 Top
Macs don't freeze? OMG. WHAT KIND OF MAC ARE YOU USING!?!?! I WANT ONE!
Reply #18 Top
Funny how the manufacturer claims it's not compatible, yet Vista claims otherwise
End of quote


Yeah, I have read a lot about that.  It's just best to try than to just assume you need a piece of hardware, or even software for that matter.

:)


Reply #20 Top
I really like vista But I agree a faster computer takes it on better my hubbies computer is better than mine, but that's about to change soon I'll be getting a quad core :) with 2GB of ram, and an NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT



My L33TSig
Reply #21 Top
Here is a screenshot of Vista Ultimate running inside Virtual PC. It uses about 450MB RAM of the allocated 1 GB RAM. There is no support for Aero because it is hosted inside virtual PC and no real graphics hardware acceleration.

Second image is with WB running with Molten. Really cool. The CPU isage is because of the notorious indexing :)