I realize that this post doesn’t conform to the very specific guidelines for very limited feedback ([Bug/Gameplay] etc), but I thought that some general comments might be welcome/interesting. I know this is still a beta, and I’m anxiously awaiting all the updates/improvements that will happen in the full version. Some of what follows may be fixed already, on schedule to be fixed, or simply not helpful at the current time, but just in case… I’ve only played the game a couple of times, so I don’t pretend to be an expert.

I’m a busy professional in the 30-something age range with a long interest in computer strategy games and fantasy RPG. I like turn-based tactics, hate real-time strategy, have played all the Civ games. While I generally like the Civ games, they leave me a bit cold, and the fantasy RPG elements of Elemental immediately appealed to me. Needless to say, when I first heard of Elemental, I was stoked.

Since I am pretty busy with “real life”, I appreciate games that are deep without being overly demanding on my time. The best games are ones that pack a large number of “tough decisions” into a short playtime. Tough decisions are when to take a calculated risk, weighing the tradeoffs, pros and cons of very different but apparently viable strategies. Who to fight? When to fight? How to win? You have to use your experience and weigh limited information to make a judgment. What is not fun are a lot of small decisions with little/no impact (e.g. you can ignore large chunks of the Crusader Kings game and do just fine), decisions that are obvious but you still have to take the time to make them to move the game forward (e.g. this is going to be a “research” city, so the only logical thing is to build improvements A, B, C, D, E, but I need to spend 10 minutes doing this in each an every such city), or (worst) optimization decisions that require you to calculate things through the way the game engine will to come up with the single, “right” answer (e.g. a lot of the worker improvements in Civilization – will my city develop faster if I build the road or the mine first?).

In my two games of Elemental, I’ve gotten glimpses of these “tough decisions” but not yet enough to really grab me … and yes, I know it’s a beta, and I’m still planning to play the final game several more times to see.

I’m curious to hear what other people think are the game-making/game-breaking decisions. So far, your research strategy and when to build a new settlement seem to be the key ones. City development has some potential here too – where to spend limited food resoureces?

The game offers multiple viable paths (e.g. adventure, magic, warfare, etc), and I’m wondering what is supposed to motivate the player to pick one over another? Or to mix and match? One method is player preference, pure and simple: e.g., I like to conquer stuff, so I’m always going to play the warfare path every time. And the game might be designed to cater to this by making sure that each path is equally viable in any given world and starting location. That’s fine, but I prefer a different game design where the player has to look at available resources and then judge the best strategies for the situation. For those who are familiar with it, Settlers of Catan (a boardgame) is a great example. You look at the board (unique each game), judge which resources will be scarce or abundant, decide which to produce yourself and which to trade for, and which to assemble into your ultimate victory. The winner is usually the player whose strategy is best adapted to that particular map. So far with Elemental, I’m getting the feeling that you will always have most resources available nearby, so that all the strategies are more or less equally viable and you just choose the one you like to play best. I did have to stretch in one game to get iron, but this was an exception.

A related suggestion would be to give the player the chance to select and/or customize his start location. Wandering around the board some at the beginning is maybe something I need to try more (Civ has trained me not to waste too much time at the beginning).

A big disappointment so far is that the game pace is pretty slow. In my opinion, one of the great things about Civ4 was that it really let you tailor the game pace by selecting map size and overall game pace. On small maps and fast settings, I could play entire games in ~4 hours, but you could play marathon games too. With the Elemental Beta, I selected the fastest/smallest options, but games are much longer. I know this is personal preference, but I just don’t have weeks to put into any game. And, my observation is that longer strategy games tend to fill the extra time with more micromanagement than the big “tough decisions”. I do think that a 4-6 hour game time should be long enough to be deep and challenging.

It’s been said before, but city development seems a little mixed in this regard. There is obviously a need to focus and specialize your cities (good!), but there is a bit too much micromanagement/optimization for my taste. First, it seems pretty obvious that you will always build all the very basic and cheap improvements (I forget exact names but workshop and merchant are prime examples, I think), but the game makes you spend the time tracking this and selecting them. Things are interesting when you have limited resources and have to decide whether to turn City A into a magic powerhouse or City B into a war machine, but there comes a time when you have enough time and money that you might as well keep both cities producing a string of minor improvements.

Unit tracking (setting units to sleep/wake, finding them, moving to next unordered unit etc) is cumbersome as has been noted in other posts. In terms of interface, Civ4 was pretty darn good in how it let you track units and streamline orders. The Total War series is an example of how an otherwise pretty good game can really bog down with poor unit interface. I remember spending a long time every turn (especially towards the late game) making sure I had issued orders to every unit before hitting the “end turn” button, and I’m getting the same vibe here. I think I’ve heard there are plans to improve this, but busy “older” gamers like myself just won’t slog through something that feels clunky or too much like work.

Quest tracking suffers from the same issues. I have a hard time seeing the little highlights on quest locations on the map when there is a lot of other stuff happening on the map too. Mountains are visually tall on the 3D map and often obscure important stuff behind.

A better interface for the spellbook would be nice. Something that let you sort by spell level, strategic vs tactical, spellbook, element needed, etc would be very handy in planning what spells you need to research.

I know that tactical battles are slated for improvement. Right now they are nothing but tedious. Are there any plans to make terrain matter? How many battles will really hinge on finding good tactics for the current, unique situation? If the goal is for the “auto resolve” feature to do as well as a human would, is that leaving much room for tactical creativity? How many times will the battles be evenly enough matched for tactics to make a difference? The Total War series of games has a brilliant concept, but the tactical battles ultimately disappointed me. They could be interesting when the armies were closely (but perhaps asymmetrically) matched and the terrain was interesting. But, 90% of the time, one side was hugely dominant, so there was no point in playing through what was supposed to be a core part of the game. D&D 4E has done a great job of making interesting, tough, tense, tactical battles, and I hope for a similar feel with the final version.

I’m also a bit worried that the game is 1 week away from being “done”, but we keep getting told “don’t worry – the final game will be a lot better”. How much can any human do in a week?

In a vain attempt to avoid probably inevitable flaming, I’ll reiterate that I know that the game is not done, and I’m keeping my mind open and hopes high for the final version. This is just my status update! I’ve heard that the developers are pretty amazing at pulling things together, and I’ve seen the excellent reviews of their other games (I’m not into sci-fi, so I haven’t played them). The game concept has amazing potential so my fingers are crossed!